Tesla claims a 4% increase in range at freeway speeds. I think it has been verified by Tesla owners. So if you're planning a long trip all on the freeway, it may be of some assistance, but in city driving, or combined driving like most do everyday, the GM engineer is correct. They are of little value and sacrifice curb appeal.Been discussed here many times, but I asked a Bolt engineer why they weren't offered. He told me, "If aero wheels provided any significant range extending benefits in normal operation, all BEVs would come with them as standard; that they don't tells you all you need to know."
jack vines
Thanks DaV8or. Yes, that 4% range increase is for the best design aero wheel covers the degreed aeronautical engineers could come up with for 18" wheels and at a steady 70 MPH. What the homebuilt or the the aftermarket might come up with for 17" wheels will vary.Tesla claims a 4% increase in range at freeway speeds. I think it has been verified by Tesla owners. So if you're planning a long trip all on the freeway, it may be of some assistance, but in city driving, or combined driving like most do everyday, the GM engineer is correct. They are of little value and sacrifice curb appeal.
Didn't everyone on most all other range question threads agree and provide extensive graphed proof the answer for more range is always, "Drive slower." ??“The aero benefit increases very strongly with speed, as the power requirement to overcome aero resistances increases with the cube of speed. I.e. if you go twice as fast, you use 8x the power. That said, aero is a small percentage at city speeds, where mass & rolling resistance dominate.
Looks like a toaster with two chrome knobs.There is a way. I saw a first gen Scion XB with Moon caps on yesterday. If they can be fitted to that car, they can be fitted to the Bolt. Apparently it's thing with XB owners. I found several pictures on the web.
![]()
If 4% allowed you to make a road trip with 1 less charging stop it could pay for itself in time savings a lot sooner than that.4% !
Sign me up!
Now I can get 114.4 MPGe on the highway instead of a paltry 110 MPGe.
In only 500,000 miles I’ll have saved enough to pay for the aero hubcaps!
4% might get a Bolt owner an extra 10 miles of range under a best case scenario. It would be unlikely that this small gain in range would be of any real significance on a longer trip.If 4% allowed you to make a road trip with 1 less charging stop it could pay for itself in time savings a lot sooner than that.
Edit: Or if it made a trip "doable" in your EV where otherwise you would take an ICE vehicle it could pay for itself in real money from gasoline savings.
TimBolt is absolutely right! One of my father's favorite phrases used to be: "The power required to overcome aerodynamic drag increases as the cube of velocity." Driving couple MPH slower will probably give a much greater benefit than driving at the original speed with aero hubcaps.Anyone who wants to eek out an extra few miles just needs to drive more slowly, a much more effective, and proven, alternative to a set of aftermarket hubcaps that may or may not provide any real advantage.
That's what I figured. People just like them for looks and the knowledge that the car is a teensy-weensy bit more efficient. Kind of a win-win for folks that like the smooth look.Of course, if fitting aero hubcaps to a Bolt makes someone happy, more power to them, but probably not more range.
Of course I've been on roads in the U.S. where driving 65 even in the right lane was dangerous. Granted it's not common because trucks usually bring the right lane down to 55-60 but on a smaller highway without much truck traffic the flow of traffic could be 80 in the left lane and 75 in the right.Anyone who wants to eek out an extra few miles just needs to drive more slowly, a much more effective, and proven, alternative to a set of aftermarket hubcaps that may or may not provide any real advantage.
Sorry, but I refuse consider myself the "dangerous" one for driving the speed limit in the rightmost lane.Of course I've been on roads in the U.S. where driving 65 even in the right lane was dangerous.
Agree, Tim, as the actual percentage of most road trip miles spent at a steady 70 MPH will vary considerably.4% might get a Bolt owner an extra 10 miles of range under a best case scenario. It would be unlikely that this small gain in range would be of any real significance on a longer trip.
Anyone who wants to eek out an extra few miles just needs to drive more slowly, a much more effective, and proven, alternative to a set of aftermarket hubcaps that may or may not provide any real advantage.
Of course, if fitting aero hubcaps to a Bolt makes someone happy, more power to them, but probably not more range.
The resident engineers please do the math, but given the cube effect, would reducing speed from 70 to 69 reduce the power requirement approx 4% ?“The power requirement to overcome aero resistances increases with the cube of speed."
Where's around here? Are these actual local laws, or just perceptions of local customs, or behavior?I don’t know if ya’ll know but around here the slow lane is speed limit +5, and it goes up 10mph every lane to your left. It’s why we get so upset with people going the speed limit in the Great Wall of china lane.
I'm sure the people who drive the speed limit in the left lane tell themselves the same thing.Sorry, but I refuse consider myself the "dangerous" one for driving the speed limit in the rightmost lane.
Agreed. In fact, in California you can legally drive below the speed limit. Just because the speed limits are lightly, to not enforced at all and the mob mentality has decided that he who drives fastest rules the road, doesn't mean I have obey mob rule. If somebody wants to pass me when I'm doing 55 in the slow lane, it's on them to do so safely. I have no obligation to pick up the pace.Sorry, but I refuse consider myself the "dangerous" one for driving the speed limit in the rightmost lane.