Joined
·
5 Posts
About a month ago I bought the Chevrolet Bolt EV, I have heard that charging the battery 100% can cause damage to it. The manual says nothing about it. That's right?
Thank you, so I am doing it tooHere are some Torque Pro screen shots of our 2017 Bolt LT at full, half, three bars, and empty. Unless leaving on a long trip, our Bolt is only charged to "hilltop", which is typically 87%-89%. We seldom get down to 3 bars.
View attachment 27461 View attachment 27462 View attachment 27466 View attachment 27467
Nissan used to really emphasize the above on model year '11 to '13 Leafs in the manual, esp. the high state of charge portion, until they removed the 80% limiter option on US '14 Leafs. (I've had a '13 Leaf for over 6 years and had been following Leaf at least a bit since before it went on sale.)There are many opinions on the internet, but the facts are clear. All lithium ion batteries, currently produced, suffer greater degradation the closer your charge to full, and discharge closer to empty. There is no dispute on this matter among researchers, or battery makers. Most OEMs are obviously not going to bring this up.
You don't have to believe anything. It is all right there on Torque Pro. Look at the screen shots I posted. The cells, when charged to "full" are below 4.2 volts, and at "empty" they are above 3.2 volts.One other data point is that it is broadly believed that “100% charge” on the Bolt is not actually charging the battery all the way to its 100% maximum capacity, it's more like 96%, and likewise 0% is more like 4%.
I am trying to keep my Bolt EV to retirement and beyond. 40-60% is more than enough for my daily commute. I est to need about 50 cycles per year, so 500 per decade and 1000 over 20 years.You don't have to believe anything. It is all right there on Torque Pro. Look at the screen shots I posted. The cells, when charged to "full" are below 4.2 volts, and at "empty" they are above 3.2 volts.
If Jeff Dahn is right, it will all be moot soon, and Tesla will own the EV space.
It's not all-or-nothing though. It's not that you battery instantly gets damaged when it hits 100%. Rather, damage accumulates over time (regardless of SoC), it just accumulates faster at high/low SoC. Having a 40% degraded battery doesn't matter to me day-to-day.If you always treat your Bolt so that you don't dare charge it above 80% or run it down below 20%, it's like having a Bolt whose battery is already 40% (or more) degraded!
Correction, so cycling 40-60% daily would mean probably 300 cycles a year, so 3k per decade and battery degradation of 15% and 6k cycles. I would be retired by then and driving very little. But assuming I drive just as much and extending to 20 years with 6k cycles, degradation would be 30%, leaving me with 70% capacity - still more than enough for travels in the area, including neighboring cities, in one charge.I am trying to keep my Bolt EV to retirement and beyond. 40-60% is more than enough for my daily commute. I est to need about 50 cycles per year, so 500 per decade and 1000 over 20 years.
1C rate means discharing at 60KW continuously. However, the Bolt is rated to go about 3.66 hours @ 65mph (60KWh battery), so it's averaging at 0.27 C. Another great news for longevity.
A "charge cycle" is full-empty-full. If you are cycling 60-40-60, that's only 20% delta, which is much less stressful than 100%. In fact, cycling 60-40-60 five times is better than 100-0-100 one time. Your battery should last a very long time unless there is some unforeseen catastrophic failure.Correction, so cycling 40-60% daily would mean probably 300 cycles a year, so 3k per decade and battery degradation of 15% and 6k cycles. I would be retired by then and driving very little. But assuming I drive just as much and extending to 20 years with 6k cycles, degradation would be 30%, leaving me with 70% capacity - still more than enough for travels in the area, including neighboring cities, in one charge.
This is a key fact that most people have a hard time understanding about Lithium based batteries. Battery chemistries differ to suit what the manufacturer wants from the cells, but the overall trend seems to hold true. The assumption is that your car will be used on a regular basis. Keeping your battery at full, or worse at empty, for extended periods of time (months), is also detrimental to cell health. This has also been shown in various studies, however each cell chemistry is different. Based on various articles, it seems as though GM specified a more mediocre cell chemistry to allow future expansion to higher energy density cell chemistires (more mi/kW) whereas Tesla chose a more aggressive chemistry but is dialing back the range because some users are pushing the batteries too hard. It's all a trade off in the auto industry, but I'm hoping GM played it on the safe side because we hope to own our Bolt for another 8-10 years after which we would consider battery service (individual cells, hopefully not the whole pack) part of the typical EV maintenance.A "charge cycle" is full-empty-full. If you are cycling 60-40-60, that's only 20% delta, which is much less stressful than 100%. In fact, cycling 60-40-60 five times is better than 100-0-100 one time.