Joined
·
7,175 Posts
As you point out, driving electric is already super cheap from a cost per mile basis. The cheaper it is per mile for me to drive, the less interest I have in modifying the vehicle or my own behavior to reduce that cost further.
That's the law of diminishing returns at play. A car that gets 25 MPG might consume 480 gallons in a year. Doubling the efficiency to 50 MPG, that car consumes 240 gallons, a saving of 240 gallons. Doubling the efficiency again to 100 MPG would take extremely costly engineering measures, but this time only save 120 gallons. Each doubling is much harder to achieve, yet saves only half as much as the previous doubling.
The only way I would have an interest in improving the efficiency of the Bolt is if there was a frequent trip that is just within the capabilities if only I made some relatively simple mod. The other time I would have an interest is when considering things like adding additional storage. I'd choose a hitch mounted box rather than roof, because I want the thing that isn't going to harm efficiency (and likely improves it).
That's the law of diminishing returns at play. A car that gets 25 MPG might consume 480 gallons in a year. Doubling the efficiency to 50 MPG, that car consumes 240 gallons, a saving of 240 gallons. Doubling the efficiency again to 100 MPG would take extremely costly engineering measures, but this time only save 120 gallons. Each doubling is much harder to achieve, yet saves only half as much as the previous doubling.
The only way I would have an interest in improving the efficiency of the Bolt is if there was a frequent trip that is just within the capabilities if only I made some relatively simple mod. The other time I would have an interest is when considering things like adding additional storage. I'd choose a hitch mounted box rather than roof, because I want the thing that isn't going to harm efficiency (and likely improves it).