“Here we go again,”indeed. I’ve waded through a lot of the discussions but haven’t seen anything about range.Here we go again!
Happy new year all!
The only reason there would be any difference is if you sometimes used the hydraulic brakes in "D" mode. That would happen if you try to brake too aggressively for regen to deal with. One of the nice things about "L" mode is you know for sure that you're not using the hydraulic brakes as long as you don't put your foot on the brake pedal.Several posts have convinced me D and L use approximately the same number of KWh. But, do they regenerate the same? In other words, do you get better range with one over the other?
If you have elevation changes, then I would think D would have better range by avoiding any heavy regen. As great as regen is, it has some losses. Only advantage to L is that it would possibly maintain speed better on steep declines.I'm not sure I believe that the range in D is the same in L. I've been doing some anecdotal experimentation with my 168 mile commute each day. Seems that with my mostly highway commute, I get better range in D rather than L.
You don't have to regen any more in L mode than you do in D mode. If you choose to slow down in L mode more than you would in D mode, that's your choice - it's not something L mode somehow forces you to do.If you have elevation changes, then I would think D would have better range by avoiding any heavy regen.
Agree, but if you're on a long commute you'll most likely be using the cruise control. The cruise control will aggressively maintain speed. Which I like, but would assume that it would potentially waste some energy over time in L vs D by using slightly more regen to maintain speed on downhills.You don't have to regen any more in L mode than you do in D mode. If you choose to slow down in L mode more than you would in D mode, that's your choice - it's not something L mode somehow forces you to do.
If the cruise control set point is the same then the amount of regen used will be the same. "D" vs "L" mode doesn't magically change the amount of energy that needs to be recouped to control downhill speed. There would only be a difference if cruise control in "D" mode allowed the speed to rise significantly above the set point, and to the best of my knowledge that doesn't happen.Agree, but if you're on a long commute you'll most likely be using the cruise control. The cruise control will aggressively maintain speed. Which I like, but would assume that it would potentially waste some energy over time in L vs D by using slightly more regen to maintain speed on downhills.
My informal experiments maintaining speed going downhill in "D" mode and using the brake pedal vs using "L" mode and not touching the brake pedal have led me to believe that "D" can produce the same amount of regen that "L" does. If the hill is steep enough, you might exceed the car's capacity to regen in "D" mode and end up engaging the friction brakes without realizing it, but then you'd have to do the same to maintain the same speed in "L" mode anyway. And I've found precious few hills steep enough for that to happen.If, when driving (and coasting) in "D", you do NOT use the regen paddle and ONLY use your friction brakes, you will get less range.
Did you mean "pedal" or "paddle"? This makes a difference. Here in WV, we have many hills and I can traverse most of them using the paddle and never touching the pedal. Of course, every time you use the pedal, you lose energy as heat, even if the "pedal" introduces slight "regen".My informal experiments maintaining speed going downhill in "D" mode and using the brake pedal vs using "L" mode and not touching the brake pedal ...
Yes, good point (even if not on topic LOL).Reiterating the more important point... driving in L is much safer. When you need to do an emergency stop, your car slows down once you lift your foot from the accelerator and reach for the brake, increasing the braking time to slow the car. Also, in L mode, if something medically bad happens to the driver, the car stops instead of ramming into something.
I meant "pedal". My point was that from what my unscientific trail runs down hills I found when you use the brake pedal (the one you push with your foot) in "D" mode you can get as much regen as you do in "L" mode. It's not just "slight", it appears to be equivalent. So I don't really believe that "D" mode is any less efficient unless you need to apply so much braking force that it exceeds the regen range of the pedal and starts using the friction brakes. I only have to brake that hard very, very rarely, so it's basically a non-issue.Did you mean "pedal" or "paddle"? This makes a difference. Here in WV, we have many hills and I can traverse most of them using the paddle and never touching the pedal. Of course, every time you use the pedal, you lose energy as heat, even if the "pedal" introduces slight "regen".
Is this her?Yes, good point (even if not on topic LOL).
One of the main reasons I like that my mother uses L mode. She's a good driver, but reflexes arent the best once one is beyond 70 yrs and L mode gives me more peace of mind for her. Plus she loves it of course, it's a great way to drive IMO.