Joined
·
55 Posts
Well, this bodes ill. https://thehill.com/policy/energy-e...-threatens-to-cut-gms-electric-car-incentives
All the Trumpets around here tell me my Bolt runs on coal. Clearly he is confused.
Wow. You say that with such conviction - almost as if you've already seen something like that happen before.I predict that the most that will happen is that Trump will sign some Executive Order that directly conflicts with existing law and then in short order that will be struck down by the courts, then Trump will attack the judges involved.
Not going to happen. GM has excess production capacity and car models that aren’t selling. The GM plant closings address both of these issues. GM is making prudent business decisions based upon market conditions.I'm wondering if Mary Barra can put together a deal whereby she reopens some of those plants in exchange for favorable legislation. If GM is to be believed, they would like to see ZEV mandates and other EV-friendly measures. Trump would be able to claim victory even if he got totally played. It could turn out well.
Maybe we can get Mexico to pay.I predict that the most that will happen is that Trump will sign some Executive Order that directly conflicts with existing law and then in short order that will be struck down by the courts, then Trump will attack the judges involved.
Ford *improved* the assembly line, he didn't invent it.For once, it appears that GM won’t be caught flat-footed as the auto industry undergoes its greatest transformation since Henry Ford developed the mass production assembly line. That’s a good thing.
Yes, other industries had versions of assembly lines, but Ford’s was the first developed for the automotive industry.Ford *improved* the assembly line, he didn't invent it.
Correct. R.E.O. (Oldsmobile), had already come up with an assembly line process.Ford *improved* the assembly line, he didn't invent it.
Good point and clearly GM has some tough calls to make, but I also agree with Usain in that GM's push for EV-friendly policies does align itself with their increasing push into the Cruise program. If the recently announced closures are required to address an excess production of models that are not selling, making GM less competitive by further removing gov incentives I imagine would only add to their woes. My hope would be that GM can use the obvious reality of their current situation to attract appropriate gov incentives to help in the drive to keep the American auto worker working. While some of the layoffs are likely inevitable, possibly with the right support some of them could be avoided.Not going to happen. GM has excess production capacity and car models that aren’t selling. The GM plant closings address both of these issues. GM is making prudent business decisions based upon market conditions.
GM has also announced that the Cruise (not Cruze) autonomous vehicle program is getting increased funding, including a nearly $3 billion investment from Honda. Mass production of the Cruise autonomous vehicle is scheduled to begin in 2019, and GM is hiring thousands of new workers for the Cruise division. These vehicles will be built at the same Orion Michigan plant that builds the Bolt, and they will use the Bolt EV platform.
For once, it appears that GM won’t be caught flat-footed as the auto industry undergoes its greatest transformation since Henry Ford developed the mass production assembly line. That’s a good thing.
The announcement did not say they were closing the plants, it said they had discontinued the vehicles built in those plants and "had no new vehicles planned for those assembly plants"I'm wondering if Mary Barra can put together a deal whereby she reopens some of those plants in exchange for favorable legislation. If GM is to be believed, they would like to see ZEV mandates and other EV-friendly measures. Trump would be able to claim victory even if he got totally played. It could turn out well.