
GM to spend $1 billion to expand Chevy Bolt EV recall due to fires
General Motors on Friday said it is expanding its recent recall of Chevrolet Bolt EVs to newer models of the electric car due to potential fire risks.
and don't drain the battery below 70 miles.I saw the press release. Don't charge above 90%. Bummer dude.
And possibly frag you.I have come to the conclusion that LG is the Takata of batteries. How many of those Takata air bags are in Japanese cars as we speak, with no replacements available? How many have had similar problems with the early recall replacements?
The good news is that those air bags don't seem to burn your car up, although they might explode on you as you're driving down the road![]()
I don’t think they have much of a choice right now.Ask away , don't believe gm wants em
Tell them this and see if they'd do a buyback.So what are we supposed to do if we don't have any outside parking? I live in an apartment that has no street parking and only has a residential parking garage that is indoors (it's underground).
So what are we supposed to do if we don't have any outside parking? I live in an apartment that has no street parking and only has a residential parking garage that is indoors (it's underground).
Not a chance...LG Chem might go Bankrupt on this one.
This defect must have extra checks for them in new cell production. XRAY, etc. That’s why they can replace them with new modules and know they will be safe. …unless some other problem crops up.The press release indicates that the two defects they've identified are "a torn anode tab and folded separator":
Not me. Im using mine same as always. If it burns, it burns. I paid for it. I’m gonna use it. At least I know what could happen. Gonna need a longer extension cord.I'm planning on mostly parking my Bolt the next few months. Just did a target charge to 50% and leaving it alone...unplugged. As long as it doesn't get cold this is probably the safest bet. Lithium is happy at 50%.
It probably doesn’t. It probably reduces the chances that those defects will cause a fire, but we don’t know. And I don’t care.How does keeping the battery below 90% charge and above 70 miles range fix the manufacturing defect mentioned in the GM Press release?
"In rare circumstances, the batteries supplied to GM for these vehicles may have two manufacturing defects – a torn anode tab and folded separator – present in the same battery cell, which increases the risk of fire."
Well, then you better add 'full replacement value' to your auto insurance.Not me. Im using mine same as always. If it burns, it burns. I paid for it. I’m gonna use it. At least I know what could happen. Gonna need a longer extension cord.
Yeah, I think this is just more 'out of an abundance of caution' until more cases appear.My question now is if they did identify the issues why did they think the us made were unaffected until now? Because of the one fire? Before this they just assumed the process in the us was better?
Possible it took a couple more fires and more checking / research to find out for sure...My question now is if they did identify the issues why did they think the us made were unaffected until now? Because of the one fire? Before this they just assumed the process in the us was better?
As they should. I think they handled it poorly.GM just got hammered on CNBC. This gets worse every day.
I don't think a folded separator is going to be fixed by not charging the battery all of the way. Heat during charging may cause a little expansion of the battery, but a folded separator is still there either way. If heat and expansion were this issue, then should they say something like no Level 3 charging instead?Mechanical stress from the pouch expanding and contracting.
They don't got the money for none of thisI don’t think they have much of a choice right now.